-
New Medical Record System
-
Single phrase description + impact: I led the end-to-end design and implementation of a new medical record system in a 500-bed hospital in Rwanda, that increased the quality of care and enabled to hospital to meet accreditations standards.
-
Type of project / project elements:
-
Service systems design
-
Instructional design
-
Equity-centered design
-
Capacity building
-
Steps: Inception to full implementation /evaluation
-
Project overview & problem to be solved
-
Client: CHUK / MOH
-
Date/duration: 18 months, 2015 - 2016
-
Problem to be solved + why important?: Medical record system was outdated: lost or incomplete data making patient care challenging, inconsistent documentation leading to inconsistent practices, time-consuming to document and retrieve data, did not meet requirements for accreditation. —OR— Decentralized piecemeal system - resulting in inefficiency and data loss, challenges with accreditation
-
Inconsistent practices - sub-optimized care provision.
-
Goals (match problem): EFFICIENCY - streamline healthcare service delivery; CARE QUALITY - prompt evidence-based care, manage data, get accredited; SUSTAINABILITY
-
Context: 500 bed hospital in resource-constrained (globally exploited/post-colonial) sett
-
Dealbreakers/constraints: it had to be used in all 21 inpatient departments, we had a year to complete it before the the next procurement, local ownership, limited: budget, time/personnel availably from hospital team, technology.
-
Resources: Desire for innovation at all org levels; Committed staff; Agile system
-
My role / team: Project manager, design lead, staff trainer
-
Brief description / steps of the process:
-
proposal to CEO, with scoping and M+E plan
-
refinement/agreement from admin leadership + formation of multidisciplinary team
-
needs assessment
-
designing/rapid prototyping/usability testing
-
final consensus
-
pilot
-
implement
-
audit
-
Discovery
-
Needs assessment / current state / user research —
-
Methodology choices?: participant observation, semi-structured interviews, focus groups / workshops
-
Tools for synthesis or prototyping?: not much bc fast, also untrained, GANTT Chart with dependency mapping - project / launch plan; M+E with file audit.
-
-
Market research / landscape analysis?: COHSASA, HRH clinicians, MRS in other places
-
Process: problem-solution pairs:
-
-
Problem (discovered in research or prototyping): Free-write sections - inconsistent documentation, liable to omitted or irrelevant data - lead to challenges in continuity of care
-
Insight/opportunity: forms could explain what was needed, and even prompt EBP!! And of course leap-frog preparation for accreditation
-
Outlier/inspiration: anesthesia flowsheets were good, others not so much
-
Solution: structure all sections with instructions on how to fill / what to do when possible
-
Alternatives that were disregarded + rationale: to balance specificity with consistency- err on the side of consistency - no SO specialized for each dept. = most forms cross cutting, some w specialization.
-
Problem (discovered in research or prototyping): Bound papers of general forms- any specialized or additional documents were free-floating, often misplaced, etc
-
Insight/opportunity: in reality all files needed to be flexible
-
Outlier/inspiration: best practices in other places
-
Solution: binders
-
Alternatives that were disregarded + rationale: hard decision bc pro and cons… thought about different bound notebooks for each dept, but with consults and transfers this wouldn’t work
-
-
Final Product
-
-
Description: #?? of cross-cutting forms, #?? specialty forms, binders. Weekend meeting with all admin to approve, pending funding.
-
-
Implementation
-
Pilot/validation/refinement?: Scope pilot, decision based on testing in all areas, but also w committed dept leadership to make sure it would happen.
-
Implantation prep/management/colab: team of direct providers to become trainers, d and I train the trainers, get shelves, etc. Then final decision to fund itx
-
Impact:
-
-
quantitative: Increased score on audit for meeting requirements for COHSASA accrediation
-
Qualitative: report that care is easier
-
-
Learnings
-
-
Unexpected challenges: needing selves etc on units
-
I could have instead: done a more through assessment, prepared for this earlier
-
Unexpected wins: how awesomely dedicated staff were,
-
With more resources we could have: more staff training, or even EMR
-
Next steps: continue to improve, plan to move to EMR
-
Final take-home: ???.
-
Medical Record System Design
Employer
Location
Timeline
My role
Team
Rwanda Ministry of Health
Kigali, Rwanda
18 months
Project & design lead, staff trainer
Clinical & administrative hospital staff
I led the end-to-end design and implementation of a new medical record system in a 500-bed hospital in Rwanda, that increased the quality of care and enabled to hospital to meet accreditations standards.
The healthcare delivery system in Rwanda had grown swiftly in the past he end-to-end design and implementation of a new medical record system in a 500-bed hospital in Rwanda, that increased the quality of care and enabled to hospital to meet accreditations standards.
Project summary
The problem:
-
Medical record system was outdated: lost or incomplete data making patient care challenging, inconsistent documentation leading to inconsistent practices, time-consuming to document and retrieve data, did not meet requirements for accreditation. —
-
OR— Decentralized piecemeal system - resulting in inefficiency and data loss, challenges with accreditation
-
Inconsistent practices - sub-optimized care provision.
Context + constraints:
-
it had to be used in all 21 inpatient departments
-
we had a year to complete it before the the next procurement
-
local ownership
-
limited: budget
-
time/personnel availably from hospital team, technology.
Project goals:
-
EFFICIENCY - streamline healthcare service delivery
-
CARE QUALITY - prompt evidence-based care, manage data,
-
Accredidation get accredited;
-
SUSTAINABILITY
Process steps:​
-
proposal to CEO, scoping, Project plan / M+E plan refinement/agreement from admin leadership + formation of multidisciplinary team
-
needs assessment
-
Landscape analysis
-
designing/rapid prototyping/usability testing
-
final consensus
-
pilot
-
implement
-
audit
We had less than one month to deliver:
-
New system where all Virginia residents could sign up for the vaccine
-
Database & dashboard that consolidated 1.8 million pre-existing records from 35 localities
Solution & impact:
-
Decentralized siloed process for VA residents to register for COVID-19 vaccine, resulting in vaccine delivery challenges and loss of public trust in state gov ;
-
Lack of way that VDH can track who has received vaccine - for equity and also f/u care (#50th in state)
We had less than one month to deliver: ​
Wins, losses, learnings:
-
Surprising win: xxxy
-
Unexpected hurdle: xxx
-
With more ______ we would have... xxx. ​
-
Most valuable learning: xx
1
Project scoping
2
Needs assessment
-
Process: problem-solution pairs:
-
-
Problem (discovered in research or prototyping): Free-write sections - inconsistent documentation, liable to omitted or irrelevant data - lead to challenges in continuity of care
-
Insight/opportunity: forms could explain what was needed, and even prompt EBP!! And of course leap-frog preparation for accreditation
-
Outlier/inspiration: anesthesia flowsheets were good, others not so much
-
Solution: structure all sections with instructions on how to fill / what to do when possible
-
Alternatives that were disregarded + rationale: to balance specificity with consistency- err on the side of consistency - no SO specialized for each dept. = most forms cross cutting, some w specialization.
-
Problem (discovered in research or prototyping): Bound papers of general forms- any specialized or additional documents were free-floating, often misplaced, etc
-
Insight/opportunity: in reality all files needed to be flexible
-
Outlier/inspiration: best practices in other places
-
Solution: binders
-
Alternatives that were disregarded + rationale: hard decision bc pro and cons… thought about different bound notebooks for each dept, but with consults and transfers this wouldn’t work
-
Methodologies:​
-
participant observation
-
semi-structured interviews
-
focus groups / workshops
-
GANTT Chart with dependency mapping
-
project / launch plan;
-
M+E with file audit.
-
Market research / landscape analysis: COHSASA, HRH clinicians, MRS in other place
4
Landscape analysis
5
Design & usability testing
Description: #?? of cross-cutting forms, #?? specialty forms, binders. Weekend meeting with all admin to approve, pending funding.
​
Scope pilot, decision based on testing in all areas, but also w committed dept leadership to make sure it would happen.
6
Final product & pilot
7
Full funding & implementation
7
Documentation audit
Impact
-
Implantation prep/management/colab: team of direct providers to become trainers, d and I train the trainers, get shelves, etc. Then final decision to fund it​
-
Impact:
-
-
quantitative: Increased score on audit for meeting requirements for COHSASA accrediation
-
Qualitative: report that care is easier
-
Critique & Learnings
-
-
-
Nurses explained what they needed to learn
Challenge
With extraordinary capacity growth in Rwanda's largest hospital, the medical record system no longer matched the sophistication of care.
A nurse holds a prohibitively time-comsuming patient assessment form.
Approach
Via embedded observation, intercept interviews, and systems mapping, we identified copious pain points and workarounds.
Managers discuss interdepartmental documentation challenges.
Innovation
We then created multi-disciplinary teams to explore documentation needs, research best practices, and design a new complete system.
Providers explore possibilities for new documentation practices.
Deliverables
After a year of development and a robust pilot, we implemented the new record system across all inpatient departments.
Nurses document patient care during the new system pilot.
Impact
Within three months, our audit showed significant improvements - advancing care quality, educational training capacity, and international accreditation readiness.
During rounds, providers now have information at their fingertips.